Compare
IncidentBot compared with a stitched incident stack
Many teams run incidents on four separate tools: a paging tool, a Slack bot, a status page product and a document for postmortems. Here is what changes with one.
Compare with PagerDuty| Criterion | Stitched stack | IncidentBot |
|---|---|---|
| Tools to maintain | Four, each with its own users and settings | One |
| Bills to approve | Four vendors, several of them priced per feature | One invoice, priced per responder seat |
| Where the timeline lives | Split between paging tool, Slack history and notes | One timeline for the whole incident |
| Status page | A separate product and a separate login | Included in every plan |
| Postmortem | Written from memory days later | Drafted from the timeline when you resolve |
| Stakeholder access | Often a paid seat each | Read-only viewers included and not billed |
| Paging when Slack is down | Depends on how the tools are wired | Push, SMS and voice do not depend on Slack |
